<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Don&#039;t Be A Hadron Hater! &#187; bad journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hadronhater.com/hadron/tag/bad-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hadronhater.com/hadron</link>
	<description>science lovers vs. science haters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:13:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>National Geographic Panders To The Skittish</title>
		<link>http://hadronhater.com/hadron/2008/09/22/national-geographic-panders-to-the-skittish/</link>
		<comments>http://hadronhater.com/hadron/2008/09/22/national-geographic-panders-to-the-skittish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hadronhater.com/hadron/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent article National Geographic pumps up  the fear of its readers and does not bother to offer the opposing view point until the last third of the article. Does NG really need this kind of hook? Maybe they should just stick to the pretty pictures.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a title="National Geographic Article" href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/09/080909-black-hole.html" target="_blank">recent article </a>National Geographic pumps up  the fear of its readers and does not bother to offer the opposing view point until the last third of the article. Does NG really need this kind of hook? Maybe they should just stick to the pretty pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hadronhater.com/hadron/2008/09/22/national-geographic-panders-to-the-skittish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
